Powering Up: How Varnish Removal Transforms Operations

Read how Pall’s filtration solutions helped in varnish removal from fluid in the power plant.

The Challenge

A power generation company based in British Colombia, Canada, operating an Alstom GT24B 250MW gas turbine on a combined cycle, experienced stiction of the servo-valves when modulated for various control functions during turbine start-up and shutdown.

 

The turbine lubrication system of 30,000 liters capacity using Chevron GST® ISO 46 lube oil had been in service for approx—7 years, protected by 7 µm absolute rated return-line filtration. Fluid monitoring procedures highlighted a high level of oil degradation by-products in the fluid presenting itself as 'varnish' within the fluid system; for example, the inside of the main flow filter housing indicated the presence of a heavy brownish coating of varnish material.

 

The Varnish Potential Rating or VPR℠ (i.e., the potential likelihood of a lubricant's tendency to form varnish deposits) was measured via the membrane patch colorimetry method and found to be at a level of 89, indicating a high level of insoluble oil degradation products associated with varnish, beyond the operators' critical' limit. Immediate treatment was necessary to restore the lube oil to its recommended operating conditions. This required a strong filtration solution for varnish removal in the power plant.

 

  • Solution

  • Result

A Pall VRF varnish remediation unit was installed in a kidney loop configuration for varnish removal at the power plant. The skid uses a cooler to maintain optimum oil temperature for the most efficient varnish removal before passing the oil through a 3-module filter housing, rated at 11 GPM flow rate. The filter is made with a specially designed adsorptive media optimized for removing varnish-forming precursors from the oil. At the outlet, the oil flows through a Pall SRT technology antistatic filter, rated at ß12(C) ≥ 1000 for additional protection and improved fluid cleanliness, before returning to the main reservoir.

An improvement in VPR℠ was observed, decreasing from 89 to 18, below the recommended limit of 36, after multiple system fluid passes through the VRF unit over eight weeks. There were negligible signs of varnish on the final test membranes taken during treatment. The soft varnish coating on components and flow paths was also entrained back into the fluid and removed. The plant subsequently reported no ongoing varnish-related valve stiction, which was all too common before the treatment with Pall VRF, and the elimination of the valve malfunction during the turbine start-up and shutdown.

 

There were negligible signs of varnish on the final test membranes taken during treatment. The soft varnish coating on components and flow paths was also entrained back into the fluid and removed. The plant subsequently reported no ongoing varnish-related valve stiction, which was too familiar before the treatment with Pall VRF, and the valve malfunction was eliminated during the turbine start-up and shutdown.

Contact us for specialist support below